This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on Web of Science (10)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

SAMUEL MONASH, M.D.; J. FREDERICK WOESSNER, Jr., Ph.D.

AMA Arch Derm. 1958;78(2):214-217.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

It has been stated recently by Shelley and Arthur^1-3 that there is a causal relationship between pruritus and proteolytic enzymes. Cormia et al.⁴ support this theory. The principal argument in its favor is the fact that certain proteolytic enzymes, when applied externally by injection, surface application, or scratch testing, are pruritogenic. While it may be true that the mechanism of pruritus is bound up in some way with enzymic action, as are so many other vital processes, it seems to us that the question as to whether the sensation of pruritus is caused by the proteolytic action of enzymes must be reexamined critically. Our experiments tend to show that pruritus can be produced by inactivated enzymes, devoid of any enzymic activity.

Methods in Scratch Tests with Various Proteolytic Enzymes

The enzymes were diluted in the buffered phosphate saline solution recommended by Arthur and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Miami, Fla.

From the Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine (Dr. Monash), and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Dr. Woessner).

Footnotes
Submitted for publication Feb. 14, 1958.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?