You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 80 No. 4, October 1959 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Amphotericin as a Topical Antifungal Antibiotic

A Clinical Trial

WILSON M. FRASER, M.D.; JOHN M. KNOX, M.D.

AMA Arch Derm. 1959;80(4):436-438.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

A previously unknown Streptomyces species, isolated from a soil sample obtained at Tembladora, on the Orinoco River in South America, has been found to produce two amphoteric antifungal agents which have been named amphotericin A and amphotericin B.1 Studies of their physical properties reveal slight differences between the infrared absorption spectra of the two materials. Crystalline amphotericin A exhibits the ultraviolet absorption curve of a conjugated tetraene similar to rimocidin or nystatin, while the absorption curve for amphotericin B is characteristic of a conjugated heptaene, and is similar to ascosin and trichomycin. These compounds also have different solubilities in various organic solvents. Although the chemical structure is not known, elementary analysis indicates that both compounds contain carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in similar proportion and do not contain halogen, sulfur, methoxyl, or acetyl groups.2 Pharmacological studies reveal that the two compounds are very poorly absorbed . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Houston, Texas

From the Department of Dermatology, Baylor University College of Medicine (Everett R. Seale, Chairman); Associate Professor of Dermatology (Dr. Knox).


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Feb. 27, 1959.

The amphotericin for this study was supplied by E. R. Squibb & Sons, New York.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1959 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.