This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A. G. de WILDE

Arch Dermatol. 1960;82(4):621-623.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Holland, the one-side treatment (simultaneous paired comparison method, Sulzberger)^* had already been applied before World War I (Siemens, 1938, 1939).^4,5 Especially, attention has been paid to the clinical application of this method (Siemens, 1952, 1958).^6-8 In other countries, however, scientists hardly considered this kind of research, in spite of the fact that Sulzberger has frequently pointed out the importance of the method (Sulzberger, 1940, 1946, and other places).10,11 This is the reason why Askovitz' investigations (1958)¹ have drawn our special attention. In his study a changed statistical evaluation of the results of the paired comparisons has been proposed. Askovitz' argumentation for this changed evaluation is briefly the following: Very often in paired comparison testing, patients are recorded "in whom the response to the new drug is no different clinically from the response to treatment with a blank control." The number, ND, of these patients in whom . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Leiden, Holland

Laboratory of Anatomy and Embryology, University of Leiden.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication Feb. 5, 1960.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?