You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 82 No. 6, December 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Methacholine Chloride

Vascular Effects of Parenteral Doses in Atopic Dermatitis

LEALAND L. CLARK, M.D.; ROBERT R. KIERLAND, M.D.; GRACE M. ROTH, Ph.D.

Arch Dermatol. 1960;82(6):957-964.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In 1953, Lobitz and Campbell11 described a strikingly abnormal cutaneous response in patients with atopic dermatitis. When acetylcholine and its derivative methacholine (acetyl-β-methylcholine; Mecholyl) were injected intradermally, a delayed blanch of the skin was seen at the site of injection. This was in marked contrast to the erythematous wheal that developed in normal persons. The occurrence of this delayed blanch has since been confirmed by many investigators,4,14,17,19 most of whom have accepted vasoconstriction as the cause of the delayed blanch reaction.3,12,17

This unique local vascular reaction raised the question of how patients with atopic dermatitis would respond to parenteral administration of acetylcholine and its derivatives. Our study was undertaken in an attempt to answer this question. The methyl derivative of acetylcholine, methacholine, was employed because of its increased resistance to hydrolysis. Its vascular effects are those of the parent substance.14,21

Procedure

Subjects and Patients.—

Thirty persons . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn.

Fellow in Dermatology, Mayo Foundation (Dr. Clark), Section of Dermatology (Dr. Kierland) and Section of Physiology (Dr. Roth), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation. The Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., is a part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication June 2, 1960.

Abridgment of thesis submitted by Dr. Clark to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Dermatology.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.