You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 83 No. 2, February 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Recent Treatment Programs for Generalized Scleroderma

HAROLD O. PERRY, M.D.

Arch Dermatol. 1961;83(2):300-304.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Any discussion of the treatment of scleroderma should be prefaced with the remark that such treatment is most unsatisfactory under most circumstances. This general group of diseases is among the most difficult to treat and offers the greatest therapeutic challenge. The treatment of scleroderma has been characterized by an ever-changing spectrum of oral medication, injections, and surgical procedures.

The course of scleroderma is variable with periods of progression and remission despite supposedly definitive therapy. Except for the recent studies of Curtis and Jansen1 regarding the prognosis of localized scleroderma, little information is available on the course of untreated scleroderma. The enthusiasm for the particular therapy rarely has been assessed against the prognosis of the nontreated patient. It is with this knowledge in mind that we must evaluate some therapy currently in use.

Although in the past each form of scleroderma was considered a separate entity, today the various clinical . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER, MINN.

Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation (Dr. Perry, Section of Dermatology). The Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn., is a part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication June 24, 1960.

Based on a paper that was read at the meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, Chicago, Ill., December 5-10, 1959.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.