You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 83 No. 3, March 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Antigen-Antibody Reaction Site in Contact Dermatitis

Determination by Use of Fluorescent Antibody Technique

JOAN RASKIN, M.D.

Arch Dermatol. 1961;83(3):459-465.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The exact site of the antigen-antibody reaction in allergic contact dermatitis is unknown. Early investigators were proponents of the humoral theory, believing that the site of the antigen-antibody reaction is in the blood stream. Supporters of the currently more popular cellular theory offer evidence to indicate that the site is in or on the tissue cells.16 In 1942, Coons and co-workers first demonstrated the value of using a fluorescent antibody to identify antigens in tissue.1 In the past decade there have been many refinements in the procedure,3 and the technique has been used successfully in the identification of micro-organisms5,6,10,11 and in the immunohistochemical investigation of connective tissue diseases and many other pathologic states.14,17 This paper reports the successful results of application of the technique to localize the site of the antigenantibody reaction in human subjects in experimentally produced Rhus dermatitis.

Materials and Methods

A. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BALTIMORE

From the Division of Dermatology, University of Minnesota, Dr. Francis W. Lynch, Director.

Formerly Fellow, Division of Dermatology, University of Minnesota. Presently Associate in Dermatology, University of Maryland, School of Medicine.

The staff and patients of the Hastings State Hospital cooperated in the study.

Dr. Rudolph Blazejovsky cut the sections.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication July 5, 1960.

Supported by grant from Mr. T. H. Rowell and Rowell Laboratories, Inc., Baudette, Minn., and Institutional Grant of the University of Minnesota provided by the Minnesota Division of the American Cancer Society, Inc.

Goat antihuman conjugate and electrophoretic study provided by the Baltimore Biological Laboratory, Inc., Baltimore, Md.

Fluorescein isothiocyanate courtesy of Dr. Morris Goldman, Communicable Disease Center, Atlanta, Ga.

Rhus oleoresin courtesy of Hugh Graham, Inc., Dallas, Texas.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.