 |
 |

Appraisal of Sabouraud's, Cycloheximide, and Oxgall Agars
KURT LOEWENTHAL, M.D.
Arch Dermatol. 1961;84(2):256-260.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
The need to improve the isolation technique for pathogenic fungi has prompted the use of nutrient media designed selectively to inhibit nonpathogenic micro-organisms without interfering with the growth of pathogenic fungi. While many of the selective media recommended hardly passed the stage of initial introduction, 2 received increasing attention and acclaim, namely, Littman's1 oxgall medium and Georg's2 cycloheximide agar. Their respective merits were appraised in a number of publications. A few are cited in the following: Littman, McQuown, and Schneidau,3 in 1949, stated that in 222 cases of systemic and cutaneous mycoses 5 to 6 times as many isolates were discovered on oxgall medium as on Sabouraud's dextrose agar. Georg,2 in 1953, reported that in cultures from 30 persons with suspected onychomycosis 3 times as many isolates were obtained on cycloheximide medium as on Sabouraud's agar. Shapiro, Mullins, and Pinkerton,4 in 1956, performing duplicate cultures
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Author Affiliations
FREEPORT, N.Y.
From the Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn.
Footnotes
Submitted for publication March 21, 1961.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|