You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 86 No. 2, August 1962 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Production of Hypersensitivity to Skin in Animals

CHARLES M. WILHELMJ, JR., M.D.; ROBERT R. KIERLAND, M.D.; CHARLES A. OWEN, JR., M.D.

Arch Dermatol. 1962;86(2):161-182.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Advances in the field of immunology during the last few decades have been startling, provocative, and potentially far reaching. One important phase of this brilliant work has been the concept of "autoimmune disease." This new concept that an organism can develop widespread or localized tissue disease because it has turned on itself with the weapon of hypersensitivity owes its existence to fundamental work begun early in the century during which 2 important observations were made. The first of these was the observation that organs possess serologic specificity. In 1904, Nuttall, injecting serum from various animal species into rabbits, showed that the antibody then produced by each rabbit would distinguish in the precipitin reaction between the serum used to immunize that rabbit and serum from another species. Uhlenhuth noted the first example of true organ specificity, however, when he found that optic lens antigen was specific for the optic lens no . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ROCHESTER, MINN.

Fellow in Dermatology, Mayo Foundation (Dr. Wilhelmj); Section of Dermatology (Dr. Kierland); Section of Clinical Pathology (Dr. Owen); Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation.


Footnotes

Prize essay presented at the 82d Annual Meeting of the American Dermatological Association, Chandler, Ariz., March 28-31, 1962.

Abridgment of thesis submitted by Dr. Wilhelmj to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Dermatology.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1962 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.