You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 90 No. 4, October 1964 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Books
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Venereal Diseases

By Ambrose King, TD, MB, BS (London), FRCS (England) and Claude Nicol, TD, MD, FRPC. Price, $10. Pp 301, with 164 black and white and 16 color illustrations. F. A. Davis Company, 1914-1916 Cherry St, Philadelphia, Pa 19103, 1964.

Sidney Olansky, MD, Reviewer

Arch Dermatol. 1964;90(4):455.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This is a very well-written, complete book on the venereal diseases and conditions from which they have to be differentiated. It includes syphilis, gonorrhea, chancroid, lymphogranuloma venereum, granuloma inguinale, nongonococcal urethridides, Reiter's disease, trichomonas, other treponematoses such as yaws and other lesions of the genitalia which must be differentiated plus some explanation of the public health aspect of venereal disease. This, of course, enables anyone interested in the field to get a good spectrum of the problems rather than specifics about certain diseases.

The illustrations are quite good and the descriptions are very clear. This reviewer can find little with which to disagree with the authors, but there are some minor points which should be brought to the attention, particularly of the American readers. The authors use the Wassermann reaction, and in this country we are getting away from that and would prefer to use a specific test name since . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1964 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.