This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

RAYMOND R. SUSKIND, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1966;93(5):502.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Several years ago, it became apparent to many of us that it might be very useful to have a good look at what we were doing as teachers and just how effective we were. We have tried to make our conference goals realistic ones.

In 1964, we attempted to provide a workshop setting in which we could examine, with the help of educators, some of the more important factors which relate to the effective teaching and learning of dermatology at the undergraduate level. Last year, our major goal was simply to make ourselves aware of the need to consider some of the essential factors. We carried on a dissection of the objectives of dermatologic teaching, touched upon some aspects of the learning process, considered the necessary subject content of our teaching programs (or what we should be teaching), and became familiar with some of the principles of evaluation. It was . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
PORTLAND, ORE

From the University of Oregon School of Medicine, Portland, Ore.

Footnotes
Read before the Second Conference on Undergraduate Teaching in Dermatology of the Association of Professors of Dermatology, Chicago, April 30-May 2, 1965.

Reprint requests to University of Oregon School of Medicine, Portland, Ore 97201.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?