This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

HENRY M. LEWIS, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1966;93(5):507-511.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I AM indebted to the Program Committee for the singular honor of addressing this gathering of my respected peers. It is an assignment approached with temerity, lest the quality of the contribution be other than commensurate with the erudition of this audience. All I can offer you is a survey of one university's efforts and problems in developing an undergraduate teaching program which seems to have received a modicum of favorable acknowledgment from the student body and the nondermatologic faculty.

Before this conference, each of us received a valuable survey, prepared by this association, of undergraduate teaching programs in dermatology in the United States and Canada. This survey permitted each of us, for the first time, to evaluate with some precision his position in the "have" and "have not" category. To determine the relevance of my discussion to your special situation, let us compare our standings.

Of the 92 replies . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
DENVER

From the Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver.

Footnotes
Read before the Second Conference on Undergraduate Teaching in Dermatology of the Association of Professors of Dermatology, Chicago, April 30-May 2, 1965.

Reprint requests to 2200 E 18th Ave, Denver 80206.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?