You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 93 No. 5, May 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  EDUCATION: The Second Conference on Undergraduate Teaching in Dermatology of the Association of Professors of Dermatology, Chicago, April 30-May 2, 1965
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Summary of the Round Table Discussion Groups on Teaching Methods and Materials

MAURICE T. FLIEGELMAN, MD

Arch Dermatol. 1966;93(5):530.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE FOLLOWING is a list of collective opinions and comments expressed in the discussion groups by the participants.

Methods

Lectures are less important than they used to be, but can be supplemented by other techniques, distributing summaries or outlines before the lecture, if desirable.

We have been using some good teaching methods, but they should be improved upon.

Students must be guided.

The success of teaching depends on the enthusiasm and sincerity of the teacher.

Teach what is appropriate and correct.

Student opinion versus the faculty opinion concerning course material might be solicited.

Is approach more important than factual knowledge ?

Meet students early, especially in courses of physical diagnosis and histopathology.

Students should be allowed to express their version and name for what they see.

The ideal combination is a one to one relationship between patient, student, and instructor, with the patient as the focal point of the teaching process. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

LOUISVILLE

From the Department of Dermatology, University of Louisville Medical School, Louisville.


Footnotes

Read before the Second Conference on Undergraduate Teaching in Dermatology of the Association of Professors of Dermatology, Chicago, April 30-May 2, 1965.

Reprint requests to Department of Dermatology, University of Louisville Medical School, Louisville 40208.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1966 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.