You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 98 No. 6, December 1968 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

VASOCONSTRICTOR AND SYSTEMIC ACTIVITIES OF TOPICAL STERIODS-Reply

K. J. Child, PhD; A. F. English, B Pharm; H. G. Gilbert, BSc; Anthonia Hewitt, BSc; E. A. Woollett, MI Biol
Glaxo Research Limited Fulmer Hall Fulmer, Buckinghamshire England

Arch Dermatol. 1968;98(6):685-686.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

That there are discrepancies between the relative systemic activities of anti-inflammatory steroids in rats and man is well known. In our article "Vasoconstrictor and Systemic Activities of Topical Steroids"1 we were concerned to demonstrate a correlation, if one existed, between systemic activity in animals and topical activity in man. Our results showed that for six of the eight steroids tested, the "ranking orders" for systemic activity in rats and topical activity in man agreed. The exceptions were betamethasone which had a higher and betamethasone 17-valerate which had a lower systemic ranking in rats than would have been expected from their topical activities in man. Dr. Burdick2 states that the topical activity of betamethasone 17-valerate, as measured by several other assays in rats, is also substantially below that of betamethasone and implies that we neglected to give this information in our article. We have . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1968 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.